Keeping Kansas Courts Fair and Impartial

Vote August 4, 2026

Protecting Kansas Courts

The Kansas Supreme Court has long been protected from partisan influence through a nationally respected merit-based selection system for Supreme Court justices. But that system is now under threat.

The current selection process is grounded in a merit-based system designed to ensure democratic representation, fairness, and judicial competence. Established after the 1956 “Triple Play” political scandal—when a Kansas Supreme Court seat was handed out as a political favor—the current system was overwhelmingly approved by Kansas voters.

Under this system, the Nominating Commission is geographically diverse, with members representing both rural and urban communities—from Bartlett, population 69, to Wichita, the state’s largest city. This trusted system for appointing justices, approved and created by a statewide vote of Kansans almost 70 years ago, is under attack by forces seeking to influence Kansas courts through dark money and politics.

In 2025, the Kansas Legislature voted in favor of a constitutional amendment to overhaul the process, potentially leading to partisan elections. Kansas voters will vote on this on August 4, 2026.

Get Involved Today

Our team would be happy to come to your community or event to talk about the Constitutional Amendment. Stay informed, get involved, and keep up with the latest updates.

Upcoming Events

Request A Speaker

Stay Involved

Resources & Toolkits

In the News

Our work has been recognized and featured in various news outlets, highlighting the impact of our efforts statewide. Read the latest updates below.

A BRIEF HISTORY OF KANSAS COURTS

1861

The Kansas Constitution Is Established

The Kansas Constitution established the Kansas Supreme Court, with justices elected in partisan races and vacancies filled by gubernatorial appointment.

1957

Triple Play Scandal

The Kansas City Times dubbed the Triple Play Scandal “A Brazen, Raw Deal for Kansas Justice.” In response, the legislature passed a constitutional amendment establishing merit-based selection for justices.

1958

Merit-Based Selection

Voters passed the amendment with 60% voting in favor.

1992

Montoy v. Kansas

Montoy v. Kansas claimed the state violated Article 6 of the Kansas Constitution by failing to adequately fund public schools, which requires equal educational opportunity for all students.

2005

Public Education Funding

In Montoy, the Supreme Court ordered the legislature to increase public education funding. Lawmakers debated defying the Supreme Court’s ruling, arguing the Court overstepped its authority. The Court maintained it was fulfilling its constitutional duty, sparking a separation-of-powers conflict between the branches.

2010

Gannon v. State of Kansas

The legislature made cuts to state spending in response to the recession. School districts asked the Court to reopen the Montoy case. Instead, a new case was filed, Gannon v. State of Kansas.

2013

Attempt at Ending Merit-Based Selection

Governor Brownback convinced lawmakers to end merit-based selection for the Court of Appeals, giving the Governor full control over appointments. He also sought to change the constitution to do the same for the Supreme Court but lacked the votes.

2016

Gannon v. Kansas Ruling

In the Gannon case, the Kansas Supreme Court again ordered the legislature to increase funding for public education.

2022

Kansans Vote on Abortion

After the United States Supreme Court returned authority to the states to regulate abortion, Kansas became the first state to vote on a ballot measure to restrict abortion rights. Voters overwhelmingly rejected the constitutional amendment.

2025

SCR 1611 Introduced and Passed

The Kansas Legislature introduced and passed Senate Concurrent Resolution (SCR) 1611, with Kansans scheduled to vote to maintain the current merit-based selection system on August 4, 2026.

2026

Kansans Vote on Future of Courts

On August 4, 2026, we have the power once again to decide whether Kansas courts remain accountable to the people or become vulnerable to the influence of wealthy special interests.